Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Cosmosophy I
GA 207

7 October 1921, Dornach

Lecture VI

We have seen how the study of the conditions of soul of the human being leads us into the spaces, as it were, between physical body, etheric body, astral body, and I; the study of the spiritual conditions in the human being, however, leads us beyond the phenomenon of the human being as he is here in his life between birth and death out into the vast spiritual universe. One might say that insofar as the human being is spirit he stands absolutely in relation to the whole spiritual universe. Hence it is only in this connection with the entire universe that we can study what takes place in the human being as spiritual events. The soul element is, so to speak, man's intimate inner life, taking its course in a threefold form in such a way that the thinking aspect is situated between physical body and etheric body, the feeling aspect between etheric body and astral body, and the aspect of willing between astral body and the I. We therefore remain in our study of the soul element entirely within the human being. As soon as we approach the actual spiritual events, however, we must leave the human being as he usually confronts us as a self-contained being in the world between birth and death.

Now we know—and eight days ago we were speaking of this from another viewpoint—that when we first ascend into the spiritual we come to beings who are arranged above the human being in the same way as the human being has his place above the animal, plant, and mineral realms. As we ascend we therefore have—names add nothing to the matter—the angeloi or angelic beings, the archangeloi or arch-angelic beings, and the archai or primal beings, time spirits. We have already characterized from various points of view these beings who constitute the realm we encounter when we perceive the position of human beings in regard to the spiritual. The beings whom we designate as angeloi or angels are those who have the strongest relationship to the individual, to the single human being. The individual human being actually has a relationship to the hierarchy immediately above him such that he in a way—this is not expressed very exactly, but it can be said in the way that it is commonly expressed—develops a certain relationship to such an angelic being.

Those that then make up the second hierarchy above him are the archangels. We can say of them that among their functions is that which works as folk spirit, that which therefore embraces groups of those belonging together as a people, although here there are all possible gradations.

When finally we ascend higher, to the archai, we have the guiding beings throughout certain epochs of time, beyond the differentiations among peoples. These are certainly not the only functions, let us say, of these beings, but to begin with we receive certain conceptions if we keep to these particular functions that they perform.

Just as we can make man's physical life on earth comprehensible by asking ourselves what kind of relationship the human being has to the animal organization, to the plant organization, and to the mineral organization, so we must also ask ourselves, in order to learn what man is as a spiritual being, what kind of relationship he has to these ascending stages of beings in the spiritual.

For this we must proceed in the following way. Let us picture from certain viewpoints the way in which the human being goes through the portal of death. We know that in this age of earthly evolution that encompasses many years we live as human beings in such a way that there are present in the ordinary consciousness the laws underlying the mineral realm. From birth to death man fills himself, we might say, with everything that makes the mineral realm in a certain sense comprehensible, and he has a feeling that with the concepts and ideas at his disposal he is able to understand the mineral realm.

It is not the same where the plant realm is concerned. You know that science stops short on coming to the plant realm; at best it holds to the ideal that the complicated combination of the plant cells, of living cells generally, will one day be explicable in their structure. As I have explained to you, this is beginning completely at the wrong end, because the structure of the plant, or of living cells generally, is not distinguished by being a particularly complicated structure but by the chemical structure passing into chaos. Man, however, does not get beyond the concepts of the mineral realm. With his mineral concepts he comes still less—if I may venture to say so—to what concerns the animal realm or even to self-knowledge. All this must be given by spiritual-scientific investigations. The human being thus adopts a mineral consciousness, let us call it, that is, a consciousness adapted to the mineral realm. The human being carries the outcome of this consciousness, the weaving of which takes place between birth and death, with him through death. When he therefore goes through the portal of death and lives in the spiritual realm itself, he can journey through his further existence-with what became of this consciousness.

There is essentially something else, however, that pushes up into this consciousness. What penetrates up into this mineral consciousness, in spite of not belonging to it, what colors it, is the moral consciousness. This is what arises out of all the processes of consciousness connected to our will impulses, to our conduct. What we feel as satisfaction about this or that, what we feel as remorse, as reproach and the like, all this gives color, as it were, to our mineral consciousness and is something that the human being takes with him through the portal of death. One can therefore say that the human being goes through the portal of death with a mineral consciousness colored by moral experience; with what becomes of this consciousness, he then lives further in the spiritual realm.

Man not only understands the mineral world through this mineral consciousness, but through this mineral consciousness he develops his relationship to the being from the hierarchy of the angels, therefore to that being to whom he wishes to turn as the nearest to his individual development. When the human being has gone through the portal of death, it is a question of how far, through the consequences of his mineral consciousness, he can preserve intact his relationship to this angel being. He can do this only in accordance with what from the moral side has colored this mineral consciousness, for after death this mineral consciousness strives, as it were, to spread itself out in the world. It strives to become cosmic, to adapt itself to the whole universe; it strives to get beyond what is individual.

We can also say that in life between birth and death man is nearest to the angel being when he is living in the condition out of which dreams arise, which certainly also have something to do with his individual being, and which on the one hand deny and on the other hand hold fast to this mineral-thought being. Man would be unable to find even the subconscious relationship to the hierarchy of the angels were not this mineral consciousness colored by the conditions that in a certain sense he sleeps through but that reach up out of the sleeping condition and live out their life in the world of dreams. The dream itself, though in its outlines it does not adhere to outer sense reality and often actually denies contact with it, is nevertheless woven out of the same substance as the world of thoughts is woven between birth and death. In going through the portal of death, therefore, in order to maintain the relationship to his angel being, the human being takes with him what he has developed in himself within his mineral consciousness.

Now in the way we live today in humanity's present epoch man—especially when he reckons himself to be among the most enlightened—penetrates but little with his moral experience into what he possesses as mineral consciousness. On the contrary, he makes every possible effort to hold this mineral consciousness quite apart from the moral sphere. He would like at least to set up these two worlds; on the one hand he would like to study what ultimately may be comprehended in the realm of mineral nature, and the mineral nature in the plant, animal, and human realms, and would then like to study the moral element as something surging up from his inner being. It is not harmonious with the spirit of the time to think of what lives in nature as being at the same time permeated with moral impulses. There yawns an abyss between what is of a moral and what is of a mineral nature. The human being does not easily find the bridge to incorporate the moral into the mineral nature. I have often drawn attention to how man pictures the evolution of the earth to be a purely mineral affair, from the content of the Kant-Laplace theory up to the mineral nature of modern thinking, and how man eliminates everything in the way of moral feeling. It thus comes about that the human being is able to develop only an extremely slight relationship to the being of the angeloi; in our present age he cannot unite himself intimately with his angel being, to use an ordinary expression.

If the mineral consciousness were completely separated from moral coloring, then at what I call the Midnight Hour of Existence man would face the danger of entirely losing the necessary connection with his angel being. I say he would face the danger. Today only a small number of people face this danger, but if a spiritual deepening of the whole evolution of humanity on earth does not come about, a deepening of human thinking, human feeling, and human willing, then what lives as a danger may be realized. Then there would be countless human beings who, on approaching the Midnight Hour of Existence between death and a new birth, would have to sever the relationship to their angel beings. It is true that the angel being would always keep the relationship on his part, but it would remain one-sided, from his side to the human being. The human being between death and a new birth would not be able to reciprocate adequately. We must be perfectly clear that in our modern civilization, hastening as it is toward materialism, the human being injures his relationship to his angel being, so that this relationship becomes ever looser.

Just when the human being is approaching the Midnight Hour of Existence, however, he must enter into relationship to the archangelic beings through the angel being. Should this relationship be of such a nature—as it may well be when man is living in the spiritual world—that it not only comes from the side of the angel being to humanity but can be reciprocated by the human being, then man must absorb a spiritual content, which means that he must color his moral impulses religiously.

If the present trend of evolution persists, the human being of today faces the danger of his connection with the angel being becoming so slight that he cannot form any inner relationship to the archangelic being. The archangel, however, participates in bringing man back into physical life. This archangelic being is particularly involved in building up the forces that bring man back into the community of a certain people.

When human beings live inwardly unspiritually—as has been the case for centuries—the relationship of the archangel to the human beings develops one-sidedly, and then man does not grow into his people with the inner soul being, but he is inscribed from outside, as it were, by means of the world order, into the people that the archangel is assigned to guide. One does not arrive at an understanding of our present age, which may be characterized by the one-sided way in which the peoples are cultivated, until one knows that this actually may be attributed to the souls who have recently come down to earthly existence having a loose relationship to their angel beings and by reason of this having no inner relationship to the archangelic being—thus growing into their people only from without. The people thus remains in them as an impulse from outside, and it is only through outer impulses that human beings take their place within a people, through all sorts of impulses inclining toward chauvinism. He who stands within his people with soul—and this is the case with very few people today—will be unable to develop in the direction of chauvinism, of one-sided nationalism; he takes up the fruitful forces within the people and develops these, makes these individual. He will not boast of his people in a one-sided way. He will let his people flow into his being as color, as it were, flow into his human manifestations, but will not parade this outwardly, and particularly not in an outwardly hostile attitude toward others.

The fact that today it is exactly this that provides the keynote for world politics—that all relations built on peoples create such difficulties today for human evolution—all this rests entirely on what I have been indicating. If the bond that begins in the-Midnight Hour of Existence—before and after this, throughout long periods—cannot be ensouled by one's taking the appropriate religious inwardness through the portal of death—a religious feeling that is spiritual and not merely a matter of lip service—then the archangel is able to work only on what is plant-like in the cosmos and what as plant-like nature is imparted to the human being. Through very subconscious forces connected with his plant nature, which means with that which is placed in him by his breathing condition and is modified by all that has to do with conditions of language, by everything, therefore, that in language pushes in a plant-like way into the human organism, through all this man can be guided only by his archangel. It then happens that when the human being is born, when he grows as a child, he grows into his language in a more-or-less outer way. Had he been able to find the relationship, the inner relationship of soul, to his archangel through his angel, he would then have grown with his soul into all that had to do with his language, he would have understood the genius of the language, not merely what constitutes the outer mechanical aspect of it.

Today, however, we can see how strongly it is the case that in many respects the human being is an imprint of the mechanical in his language, so that actually he does not bear the element of language as a keynote in his entire being but receives an exact imprint of it. One can see quite clearly how the facial expression itself is an expression of the element of language. What confronts us in the people, what confronts us as their unique, national physiognomy, comes to man from the archangels in a completely outer way.

What takes place outwardly in humanity, insofar as it works into the spiritual of the human being, actually can be explained only through the kind of study we pursue in an anthroposophical spiritual science. All modern anthropology and things of that kind are actually what might be called a mere playing with terminology. In what is written today by anthropologists or their kind about the configuration of humanity on the earth, about the differentiation of humanity, we really in many respects have nothing to orient us, no guiding viewpoint, because what is there understood as concept is merely the classification of outer characteristics. One could just as well redistribute the whole picture. A real content streams into the matter only if it is studied spiritually. Then, however, one must not shrink back if in this study real, concrete spiritual beings arise.

One sees from this that only spiritual deepening can heal the damages of our modern age. The damages of today, insofar as they confront us in public life, are founded on the loose relationship of the human being to his angel and the consequent loose bond with the archangel, who is thus able to have an influence only from outside.

When a human being between death and a new birth undergoes his further evolution, which after the Midnight Hour of Existence leads him once more into physical, earthly life, he enters especially the realm of the archai, of the primal spirits. These archai, these primal spirits, in the present cosmic evolution have to do with leading the human being back into the earthly limits of his being.

When the human being passes through the portal of death his further life takes its course in such a way that he experiences to begin with the consequences of his mineral consciousness with its moral coloring—thereby expanding himself, as it were, over the world. Then, after the Midnight Hour of Existence, he draws himself together again. First he is led over into the plant element, which is incorporated into him. The more nearly he approaches earthly life, the more he draws himself together, so that he is able to be born once more as a being enclosed in his skin.

What must happen to a human being when he enters the realm of the archai is an incorporating, a densification, of the plant element into the animal element. In passing through the Midnight Hour of Existence, a man acquires first the forces—naturally not the organs but first the forces—which determine his breathing and also the differentiated breathing. The concentration of these forces into the actual forces of the organs comes about only after the Midnight Hour of Existence, comes about only in the realm of the archai. Man becomes, so to speak, ever more and more human. The fact is, however, that this cosmic activity exercised upon the human being as forces coming from the archai actually organizes him in such a way that the organs tend toward the animal structure. If we perceive the human being in his relationship to the cosmos we find that while the human being is striving away from the Midnight Hour of Existence toward a new life on earth he is subject to cosmic laws, just as here on earth he is subject to earthly laws. We may say the following: the human being is defined from the immeasurable expanses of the universe, in that he draws himself together more and more. Up to the Midnight Hour of Existence there is, as it were, an expansion of man, by means of his mineral consciousness, into the breadths of the universe (see drawing, arrows), into the immeasurable breadth of the universe. When the Midnight Hour of Existence arrives (see drawing, blue) those forces incorporate themselves into the human being that work in him as plantlike forces. Man returns from this Midnight Hour of Existence in order to confine himself within the appropriate limits for earthly life (arrows going in). This Midnight Hour of Existence is altogether a tremendously significant moment in human evolution.

While after his death a human being lives on into the cosmos, he becomes increasingly one with the world. He hardly distinguishes himself from the world. Expressing myself figuratively—naturally out in the cosmos we cannot speak of physical organs, but you will understand me if I present this to you in images taken from physical existence—I might say: man learns, as it were, how the eye grows together with the light and then no longer distinguishes the eye from the light, or the sound from the ear. By expanding himself out into the cosmic breadths he grows together with the universe.

Having passed the Midnight Hour of Existence, where he begins to draw himself together in order to become once more a being with limits, there dawns in him a kind of objective conception: this is not the world, this is the human being. A consciousness grows more and more intense in the human being—a consciousness that is most intense when the human being returns into earthly life. As here on earth, however, the content of our consciousness is the minerals, the plants, the animals, the mountains, rivers, clouds, the stars, sun, and moon, so on our way back to the earth the being of man is the main conception.

It is really so that if we take the seemingly quite complicated world that lies outside our skin, with all that is within it, if we take the world with its soul and spiritual elements, it is indeed most complicated; what lies within our skin, however, is just as complicated and is different from the world outside only in size, but the size is not important. Between birth and death our world is what lies outside our skin; what is within we cannot really observe except in what during life man certainly is not, namely, the corpse. From the Midnight Hour of Existence, however, until the next life on earth, the human world, the inner being of man, is his body, soul, and spirit (see drawing, right, blue). There man is, as it were, the world. Up to the Midnight Hour of Existence we gradually lose the world as we know it through the mineral consciousness; we lose it by living into the world as though it were our self, our whole, all-embracing self, so that we no longer distinguish between our self and the world. In returning, our world becomes the human being. We do not behold the stars, we behold the membering of the human limbs; we do not behold all that is contained in the universe, let us say, between stars and earth, we behold what is within the human organization, insofar as it is formed out of spirit and soul. We behold the human being, and what we thus behold is what leads us to our renewed existence on earth. We behold the human being receiving his form.

In the time of the Midnight Hour of Existence we live in the human being who is forming himself in accordance with the plant-like. When we come into the region of the archai we live in what forms the organs of the human being, in the sense of animal forces. I have said that just as between birth and death we are dependent on what works on us from the earth, so we are dependent, in that we are outside in the universe, on what is beyond the earthly—it is no longer a question of space, but naturally we can only present this in spatial terms. The moment we pass through the archai, we can express the laws that work in us in the sense of the universe—in the same way, as during our life here in an earthly community we test the laws of the earth by the laws of modern physics—we can express these laws by relating ourselves to Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, and so on.

By relating the positions of the sun to these stars, to the heaven of the fixed stars in general, in the constellations of the sun with this heaven of fixed stars we have the laws that prevail in the realm of the will of the archai. The will that prevails there, which permeates these laws, is the will of the archai.

If we were to look outside for natural laws corresponding to our natural laws, as natural laws correspond to us here on earth during earthly existence, we would have to look to these constellations of the stars. We remain a long time in the kingdom where we are dependent on the star constellations—though not more dependent than we are dependent here on earth on natural laws where our will works also, which is something higher than the laws of nature. There too we may not speak of the cosmos in the sense of a cosmic law that works with mechanical necessity. What we find in the constellations of the stars, however, is the expression, as it were, the image, of these laws that work upon us there. As formerly, when we were in the kingdom of the archangeloi, the laws of the plant-like worked upon us, so now there work upon us the laws holding good in the animal realms.

When these things are found again through spiritual science, one comes upon the tremendously significant fact that the people in ancient times who used to acquire knowledge from certain dreamlike visions of the universe, which were then lost, that these people really showed a touch of atavistic genius, one could say, in naming this picture circle, which represented for them the heaven of the fixed stars, the Zodiac (Tierkreis, “animal circle”). I can only think that our new science of the spirit, which shows us these things again, is led from a completely different basis to an understanding of what was once grasped in a dimly sensed knowledge. It is tremendously moving when one finds the teaching about the Zodiac and its influence on the human being preserved from ancient times and when one then—quite apart from what has been preserved—with the means at the disposal of present-day spiritual science, comes once more to connect knowledge with the constellations of the sun, with the zodiacal signs, in other words, with the heaven of the fixed stars.

It is this that links the more recent science of the spirit so closely to the wisdom of the ancients. Between our time, when we wish to make spiritual science our quest, and this period when the wisdom of the ancients held sway, we have an age that was indeed necessary for the striving after human freedom; this age basically, however, was an age of darkness.

We thus come into the realm of the archai and receive and incorporate into us that which is our animal nature. What is our animal nature? Our animal nature is above all what gives us our organs, which even in number are very similar to the organs of the higher animals. Before we approach birth, however, we are stripped—if I may so express it—of the realm of the Zodiac and enter the realm of the planets—Saturn, Jupiter, and so on. In entering the realm of the planets, and thus in coming nearer to the earth, nearer the point of time when we take on the boundaries of our human form, what is incorporated into us out of cosmic law as the animal nature is given its direction, if I may express it in this way. Before we sink down into the planetary system, and therefore into the forces of the planetary system, our vertebral column, for example, has not taken on a direction away from the earth, which would raise the head aloft. We are more subject to the directional forces governing the posture of the animal. Everything, for example, that designs the hands as the organ of our soul element, not only as an organ for grasping or for walking—what makes of them organs that can act freely out of the impulses of the soul element, all this we owe to this planetary influence. All that helps us to be truly human, right into the lowest stages of our animal organization, we have by virtue of the constellations of the moon with the rest of the planets.

We are made human, therefore, as we return through the planetary system. I told you that man himself, man as he forms himself, is the world that is living in our consciousness during our return journey from the Midnight Hour of Existence. We also see how at first everything is present in him that ultimately pulsates in rhythm with the animal forces. We live through this in such a way that we actually experience a kind of decline, a kind of icy process. All this, however, is loosened on our entering the planetary realm, and this first forms the cosmic world, which we see as the human world, the world represented by the earthly human being who Wrests himself away from the animal element, who grows out of the animal element. All this now fills us; it becomes the content of our consciousness. We carry in us as a system of forces that which the cosmos has given us.

Thus we descend soul-spiritually from the spiritual worlds. We have lived through the worlds in which we were in direct touch, stood in connection with, angels, archangels, archai. We descend as man. It is true, however, that if, in the way characterized, we have failed to establish an intimate relationship to our angel being, we have difficulties when penetrating into the planetary region, because we have been unable to make any divine-spiritual connection with the world of the archai. Outwardly we become incorporated into a people. The archai are then obliged to work into us, as it were, only from outside. Through this we are given a definite place on the earth, for all the forces of the archai tend toward that end. The archangels give us our place among a people and our particular place within this people is then determined by the archai. Not imbued with soul and spirit, however, we grow in an outer, mechanical way into this environment.

This is a characterization of our modern age—that the human being no longer has that inner relationship, that intimate inner relationship, that he had to his environment in more ancient times, when he grew into this immediate environment also with his soul. This is still maintained at best in a caricaturish way—as a caricature, I repeat—when today, even if it is already coming to an end, children perhaps grow up in some particular castle after previously having been attracted to their ancestors. Here we will have a relationship that in earlier ages had to do with the soul element. Today a human being is pressed into his environment in such a way that he basically has little inner relationship to the place in which he finds himself, to which his karma takes him in an entirely outer way, so that he feels his whole placement into physical existence as something external to him.

When man's being is formed through education and life in such a way that he is filled with soul, filled with spirit, and comes to a spiritual conception of the world, he will then carry this through life between death and a new birth so that he does not lose the inner connection with his angel, so that through his archangel his soul is carried into his particular people, and so that he is not placed in a merely outer way into his immediate existence by the world of the archai. He should rather be able to absorb once again into his animal organization something that he experiences in such a way that he says: there is a deep significance in the fact that just from this place where my consciousness first gradually awakens, where my education is carried on—that just from this place I am to unfold my activity in the world. This is certainly something that should lead us to bring about reform in education, so that the human being once more feels that from the place where he is educated he takes something with him that gives him his mission in the world. When this is so, a human being grows beyond the merely outer realm of the archai. He will experience the forces directing human beings in a way that is permeated by soul and spirit, and he will grow into his new life in a way different from what is frequently the case today.

What happens, then, when the human being enters a new earthly life? His consciousness is filled with the way in which he is building himself up from within as a human being. He is filled with a world that he beholds, a world of activity, not a mere world of thought. As I have already mentioned, after the Midnight Hour of Existence this world gradually takes on the tendency of the will toward being human, and the human being immerses himself into what is offered him through heredity in the generations, through the substance he receives from his ancestors. Into this he immerses himself. He envelops himself with the physical sheath; he enters the physical world. On observing the human being spiritually, we can actually find out about the content of the soul element when he is immersing himself in a new life in physical existence.

Of all the realms lived through by the human being between death and a new birth it is natural that a human being comes into the closest relationship to the angeloi, archangeloi, archai, but these things stand in further relationship to the higher hierarchies. Between death and a new birth a human being thus pursues his course through a realm in which his relationship to that realm depends on what he carries through the portal of death. The extent to which he has succeeded in permeating with his mineral consciousness that which as spirit wishes to rise out of the depths of his being determines to what extent he can become intimate with his angel being. By being able to be intimate in this way with his angel being, however, he grows into the world of the archangeloi, so that knowing, as it were, experiencing their forces out of himself, he can consciously reciprocate and proceed further, so as to become the individualized being he must gradually become if the world is to move toward its ascent and not its decline.

It is perfectly possible to give from the most varied points of view a deeply significant description of this life between death and a new birth. One point of view is to be found in the lecture course I held in 1914 at Vienna;7 Inneres Wesen des Menschen und Leben zwischen Tod und neuer Geburt, Vienna 1914, Bibl.-Nr. 153. today I have been developing another point of view for you. All these points of view are intended to lead to increasing knowledge of the human being from his spiritual aspect. Those who are unwilling to explore a whole spiritual world in this way will never be able to grasp the spiritual in man himself. Just as we must go into the spaces between physical body, etheric body, astral body, and I in order to penetrate the soul element in its objective nature, so we must proceed out of the human being into the spiritual world to study his relationship to this spiritual world. Then we discover what actually weaves and lives in the human being as the spiritual. It is only the love of comfort today that makes man speak of the spirit in general terms. We must become capable of speaking about the spirit in all its particulars, just as we do of nature. Then there will arise a real human knowledge; as man needs it, the primeval saying of truth will be fulfilled, the saying that sheds its light from ancient Greece, the fulfillment of which must continue to be striven for by the human being—the truthful saying, “Know thyself.”

Self-knowledge is knowledge of the world, and world knowledge is knowledge of self, for if we are living between birth and death, the stars, the sun, the moon, mountains, valleys, rivers, and the plants, animals, and minerals are our world, and what lives within our human boundaries is what we are. If we are living between death and a new birth, then we are what is concealed as the spiritual behind sun, moon, and stars, behind mountains and rivers, and our outer world is then the inner being of man. World and man alternate rhythmically, the human being living both physically and spiritually. For the human being here on earth the world is what is outside. For the human being between death and a new birth the world is what is within. Hence it is a question only of alternating through the times for man to be able to say that, in the most real sense, knowledge of man is knowledge of the world; knowledge of the world is knowledge of man.

Sechster Vortrag

[ 1 ] Wir haben gesehen, wie uns die Betrachtungen der seelischen Verhältnisse des Menschen gewissermaßen in die Zwischenräume zwischen physischem Leib, Ätherleib, astralischem Leib und Ich führten, wie uns aber die Betrachtungen der geistigen Verhältnisse im Menschen gewissermaßen aus der Erscheinung des Menschen hier, wie er sie hat in seinem Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod, hinausführen in das weite geistige Weltenall. Insofern der Mensch — so könnte man sagen - Geist ist, steht er durchaus in Beziehungen zu dem ganzen geistigen Weltenall. Und daher kann man das, was sich im Menschen als geistige Geschehnisse abspielt, auch nur sachgemäß in diesem Zusammenhang mit dem gesamten Weltenall betrachten. Das Seelische ist ja sozusagen des Menschen intimes Innenleben. Es spielt sich in einer dreifachen Gestalt ab, so ab, daß das Gedankliche gelegen ist zwischen physischem Leib und Ätherleib, das Gefühlsmäßige zwischen Ätherleib und Astralleib, und das Willensmäßige zwischen dem Astralleib und dem Ich. Da also bleiben wir in der Betrachtung des Seelischen durchaus innerhalb des Menschen stehen. Sobald wir aber an wirkliche geistige Geschehnisse herantreten, müssen wir aus dem Menschen, wie er zunächst uns als geschlossenes Wesen gegenübersteht in der Welt zwischen Geburt und Tod, heraustreten.

[ 2 ] Nun wissen wir ja - und wir haben es gerade vor acht Tagen von einem gewissen Gesichtspunkte aus wiederum besprochen -, daß wir, wenn wir zunächst in das Geistige hinaufsteigen, zu Wesenheiten kommen, die in ähnlicher Weise über dem Menschen sich anordnen, wie das tierische, pflanzliche und mineralische Reich unter dem Menschen sich anordnen. Wir bekommen also dann, aufsteigend - Namen tun nichts zur Sache -, die Wesenheiten Angeloi, Engelwesenheiten; Archangeloi, Erzengelwesenheiten; und Archai, Urwesenheiten, Zeitgeister. Wir haben ja auch schon von verschiedensten Gesichtspunkten aus diese Wesenheiten, welche gewissermaßen die Reiche ausmachen, die wir antreffen, wenn wir nach dem Geistigen hin die Stellung des Menschen ansehen, charakterisiert. Diejenigen Wesenheiten, die als Angeloi oder Engel bezeichnet werden, sie sind diejenigen, die die stärkste Beziehung zu dem individuellen, zu dem einzelnen Menschen haben. Der einzelne Mensch hat ja in der Tat eine solche Beziehung zur ersten über ihm stehenden Hierarchie, so daß er gewissermaßen - es ist das nicht ganz genau ausgedrückt, aber man kann so sagen, wie es oftmals populär ausgedrückt wird — eine gewisse Beziehung zu einem solchen Engelwesen entwickelt.

[ 3] Diejenigen, die dann die zweite Hierarchie über ihm ausmachen, sind die Archangeloi. Wir können von ihnen so sprechen, daß wir ihnen zunächst in ihren Funktionen das zuteilen, was als Volksgeister wirkt, was also Menschengruppen, die volksmäßig zusammengehören, umfaßt, obwohl es da alle möglichen Abstufungen gibt.

[ 4 ] Wenn wir endlich zu den höheren Archai aufsteigen, so haben wir gewissermaßen die führenden Wesenheiten durch gewisse Zeitepochen hindurch, über die Differenzierungen des Volksmäßigen hinweg. Das ist gewiß nicht die einzige, sagen wir, Funktion dieser Wesenheiten, aber wir bekommen zunächst gewisse Vorstellungen, wenn wir uns an diese ja auch bei ihnen sich findende Funktion halten.

Archai, Urwesenheiten, Zeitgeister
Archangeloi, Erzengelwesenheiten
Angeloi, Engelwesenheiten.

[ 5 ] Wie wir nun des Menschen physisches Leben auf der Erde dadurch uns begreiflich machen können, daß wir uns fragen: Was hat er für Beziehungen zur tierischen Organisation, zur pflanzlichen Organisation, zur mineralischen Organisation? -, so müssen wir uns fragen: Was hat er für Beziehungen zu diesen ins Geistige hineinragenden Wesensstufen? —, um ihn eben als geistiges Wesen kennenzulernen.

[ 6 ] Dazu müssen wir in der folgenden Weise vorgehen. Stellen wir uns einmal vor nach gewissen Gesichtspunkten, wie der Mensch durch die Pforte des Todes geht. Wir wissen, daß so, wie wir nun einmal jetzt in diesem Zeitraume der Erdenentwickelung, der sehr viele Jahre umfaßt, als Menschen leben, dem gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein gegenwärtig werden solche Gesetzmäßigkeiten, die dem mineralischen Reiche zugrunde liegen. Der Mensch füllt sich sozusagen von seiner Geburt bis zu seinem Tode mit alldem an, was ihm das mineralische Reich in einem gewissen Sinne begreiflich macht, und er hat ein Gefühl davon, daß er mit den ihm zur Verfügung stehenden Begriffen und Ideen das mineralische Reich begreiflich finden kann.

[ 7 ] Nicht so ist es gegenüber dem Pflanzenreiche. Sie wissen ja, daß die Wissenschaft vor dem Pflanzenreiche halt macht, höchstens das Ideal aufstellt, daß die komplizierte Zusammensetzung der Pflanzenzellen, der lebenden Zellen überhaupt, einmal erklärlich werden in ihrer Struktur, was, wie ich Ihnen auseinandergesetzt habe, ein völlig verkehrtes Beginnen ist, weil ja die Struktur der Pflanze oder der lebenden Zellen überhaupt sich nicht durch eine besonders komplizierte Struktur auszeichnet, sondern durch ein Hineingehen der chemischen Struktur ins Chaotische. Der Mensch kommt aber eben über diese Begriffe des Mineralischen nicht hinaus. Noch weniger kommt er mit seinen, wenn ich so sagen darf, mineralischen Begriffen in das Tierische hinein, oder gar zur Selbsterkenntnis. Das alles muß ja durch geisteswissenschaftliche Forschungen gegeben werden. Der Mensch eignet sich also an ein — nennen wir es so — mineralisches, das heißt für das Mineralische geeignetes Bewußtsein.

[ 8 ] Dieses Bewußtsein, das ja gewoben wird zwischen der Geburt und dem Tode, trägt er in seinen Folgen durch den Tod hindurch. Mit dem also, was aus diesem Bewußtsein werden kann, wenn er die Pforte des Todes durchschreitet und im geistigen Reiche selber lebt, mit dem hat er dann sein weiteres Dasein zu durchwandern.

[ 9 ] Aber es schlägt in dieses Bewußtsein noch wesentlich ein anderes herauf. Was sich in dieses mineralische Bewußtsein hereinerstreckt, trotzdem es durchaus nicht zu ihm gehört, was es tingiert, das ist das moralische Bewußtsein; das ist dasjenige, was da kommt aus all den Bewußtseinsvorgängen, die sich an unsere Willensimpulse, an unsere Handlungsweise anschließen. Was wir da empfinden als unsere Befriedigung über dieses oder jenes, was wir als unsere Gewissensbisse, als unsere Vorwürfe und dergleichen empfinden, das alles färbt gewissermaßen unser mineralisches Bewußtsein, und das ist etwas, was der Mensch ebenso mitnimmt durch die Pforte des Todes. Man kann also sagen: Mit einem mineralischen Bewußtsein, tingiert durch das moralische Erleben, tritt der Mensch durch die Pforte des Todes; und mit dem, was sich als Folge davon ergeben kann, lebt er dann im geistigen Reiche weiter.

[ 10 ] Nun ist es so, daß der Mensch durch dieses mineralische Bewußtsein nicht nur hier die mineralische Welt versteht, sondern daß er durch dieses mineralische Bewußtsein eben gerade seine Beziehung entwickelt zu dem Wesen aus der Hierarchie der Angeloi, also zu demjenigen Wesen, an das er sich wenden will als das seiner individuellen Entwickelung am nächsten stehende. Und wenn der Mensch nun durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen ist, so handelt es sich darum, inwiefern er durch die Folgen seines mineralischen Bewußtseins gewissermaßen die Beziehung zu diesem Engelwesen aufrechterhalten kann. Er kann es nur nach Maßgabe dessen, was von der moralischen Seite her dieses mineralische Bewußtsein tingiert hat. Denn dieses mineralische Bewußtsein strebt nach dem Tode gewissermaßen zur Ausbreitung in die Welt. Es strebt dazu, kosmisch zu werden, dem Weltenall sich anzupassen; es strebt über das Individuelle hinaus.

[ 11 ] Wir können ja auch sagen, daß im Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod der Mensch dem Engelwesen am nächsten steht, wenn er in dem Zustande lebt, aus dem dann die Träume hervorgehen, die ja durchaus auch etwas mit seinem individuellen Wesen zu tun haben, und die eigentlich verleugnen auf der einen Seite und doch wiederum festhalten auf der anderen Seite das mineralisch-gedankliche Wesen. Der Mensch würde auch jenes unterbewußte Verhältnis zu der Hierarchie der Angeloi nicht finden können, wenn nicht sein mineralisches Bewußtsein tingiert wäre von den Zuständen, die er in einem gewissen Sinne verschläft, aber die doch diejenigen sind, die herausragen aus dem Schlafzustande, die sich dann in den Traumwelten ausleben. Der Traum selber ist ja mit Ausnahme davon, daß er sich mit seinen Konturen nicht an die äußere sinnliche Wirklichkeit hält, daß er auch den Kontakt mit der äußeren sinnlichen Wirklichkeit vielfach verleugnet, dennoch aus demselben Stoff gewoben, aus dem die Gedankenwelt gewoben ist zwischen der Geburt und dem Tode. Der Mensch nimmt also, indem er durch die Pforte des Todes schreitet, dasjenige mit, was er in sich entwickelt hat innerhalb seines mineralischen Bewußtseins, um die Beziehung zu seinem Engelwesen aufrechtzuerhalten.

[ 12 ] Nun, so wie wir heute in unserer gegenwärtigen Menschheitsepoche leben, so durchdringt der Mensch — namentlich dann, wenn er sich zu den ganz aufgeklärten Menschen rechnet — wenig dasjenige, was er als mineralisches Bewußtsein hat, mit seinem moralischen Erleben. Im Gegenteil, er ist so viel als möglich bemüht, dieses mineralische Bewußtsein fernzuhalten von dem Moralischen. Er möchte in sich mindestens diese zwei Welten aufrichten: er möchte auf der einen Seite alles das betrachten, was sich schließlich im Reiche der mineralischen Natur, und soweit die mineralische Natur in das Pflanzliche und Tierische und Menschliche hineinreicht, eben begreifen läßt, und möchte dann als etwas, was eben nur aus seinem Inneren herausquillt, das Moralische betrachten. Es widerstrebt dem heutigen Zeitgeiste, das, was in der Natur lebt, zu gleicher Zeit mit moralischen Impulsen durchtränkt zu denken. Es klafft ein Abgrund zwischen dem Moralischen und dem Mineralischen. Der Mensch findet nichtleicht dieBrücke, um das Moralische einzugliedern in das Mineralische. Ich habe ja öfter darauf aufmerksam gemacht, wie der Mensch sich die Erdenentwickelung rein mineralisch vorstellt, von dem Inhalte der Kant-Laplaceschen Theorie aus bis wiederum zu dem eben, was in der Neuzeit mineralisch gedacht ist, und wie der Mensch da ausschaltet alles das, was moralisches Empfinden ist. So kommt es, daß der Mensch eine außerordentlich geringe Beziehung entwickeln kann zu dem Wesen der Angeloi, daß er in unserem heutigen Zeitenlaufe gewissermaßen — populär gesprochen - sich wenig intim verbinden kann mit seinem Engelwesen.

[ 13 ] Wenn das mineralische Bewußtsein ganz und gar getrennt wäre von den moralischen Tingierungen, dann würde der Mensch sogar in die Gefahr kommen, vor dem, was ich nenne die Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins, die nötige Verbindung mit dem Engelwesen ganz zu verlieren. Ich sage: in die Gefahr kommen. Es kommen heute noch die wenigsten Menschen in diese Gefahr; aber wenn nicht eine geistige Vertiefung der ganzen Menschheitsentwickelung auf der Erde, des Menschendenkens, Menschenfühlens und Menschenwollens über die Erde hin eintritt, dann wird sich, was da als Gefahr lebt, allerdings verwirklichen können, und es würde zahlreiche Menschen geben, welche zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt, schon wenn sie in die Nähe der Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins kommen, die Beziehungen zu ihren Engelwesen abbrechen müßten. Das Engelwesen würde zwar noch immer Beziehungen unterhalten; die würden aber einseitig von ihm zum Menschen bleiben. Der Mensch würde sie nicht in einer genügenden Weise zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt erwidern können. Wir müssen uns durchaus klar sein, daß die dem Materialismus zueilende neuere Kultur für das Geistige des Menschen die Bedeutung hat, daß der Mensch die Beziehung zu seinem Engelwesen beeinträchtigt, daß diese Beziehung immer loser und loser wird. Nun muß aber der Mensch gerade dann, wenn er gegen die Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins zu kommt, die Beziehung zu dem Erzengelwesen durch das Engelwesen anknüpfen. Soll diese Beziehung, wie sie durchaus sein kann, wenn der Mensch in der geistigen Welt drinnen lebt, eine solche sein, daß sie nicht nur einseitig von dem Engelwesen nach der Menschheit hin geht, sondern daß sie auch von dem Menschen erwidert werden kann, dann muß eben der Mensch einen geistigen Inhalt aufnehmen, das heißt, er muß seine moralischen Impulse religiös tingieren.

[ 14 ] Der Mensch der heutigen Zeit steht also vor der Gefahr, daß, wenn dieselbe Entwickelung weitergeht, er eine lose Beziehung zu seinem Engelwesen erhält und dadurch auch keine innere Beziehung anknüpfen kann zu dem Erzengelwesen. Aber das Erzengelwesen ist schon daran beteiligt, ihn wiederum zurückzubringen in das physische Leben. Das Erzengelwesen ist namentlich daran beteiligt, die Kräfte auszubilden, die ihn zurückbringen in eine gewisse Volksgemeinschaft.

[ 15 ] Wenn die Menschen, wie das ja schon seit Jahrhunderten der Fall ist, innerlich ungeistig leben, dann entwickelt sich eben die Beziehung der Erzengel zum Menschen einseitig, und dann wächst der Mensch nicht mit seinem inneren seelischen Wesen in das Volkstum hinein, sondern er wird gewissermaßen von außen, sagen wir, durch die Weltenordnung, in das Volkstum hineingestellt, das dem Erzengel zu leiten zugeteilt ist. Man kommt nicht früher zu einem Verständnis unserer heutigen Zeit, die ja gerade dadurch charakterisiert ist, daß in einer so einseitigen Weise die Volkstümer kultiviert werden, bis man weiß, daß das davon herrührt, daß eigentlich die Seelen, die in der letzten Zeit heruntergekommen sind in das irdische Dasein, eben eine lose Beziehung zu ihrem Engelwesen und dadurch keine innere Beziehung zu dem Erzengelwesen haben, daß sie dadurch gewissermaßen nur von außen hineinwachsen in ihr Volkstum; daß das Volkstum dann durchaus als ein seelenloser Impuls in ihnen ist und die Menschen eben nur durch äußerliche Impulse, durch Zusammengehörigkeiten der Sprache, durch allerlei nach dem Chauvinismus hinneigende Impulse drinnenstehen in dem Volkstum. Wer seelisch in seinem Volkstume drinnensteht — und das ist ja heute bei den wenigsten Menschen der Fall -, der wird durchaus nicht zum Chauvinismus, zum einseitigen Nationalismus sich entwickeln können, sondern er wird das, was an fruchtbaren Kräften im Volkstum drinnen ist, entwickeln, das wird er individuell machen. Aber er wird nicht in einer gewissen einseitigen Weise auf sein Volkstum pochen. Er wird es gewissermaßen überall als die Farbe seines Wesens hineinfließen lassen in seine menschlichen Offenbarungen, aber er wird es nicht in einer äußerlichen Weise, namentlich in einer gegen andere gegnerischen äußeren Weise, hervorkehren.

[ 16 ] Daß das heute so der Fall ist, daß das heute geradezu den Grundton abgibt für die Weltpolitik, daß alle Verhältnisse, die sich auf dem Volkstum aufbauen, heute der menschlichen Entwickelung solche Schwierigkeiten machen, das beruht durchaus auf dem, was ich eben angedeutet habe. Wenn nämlich die Verbindung, die in der Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins — vor und nachher, durch lange Zeiten hindurch - eintritt, wenn diese Verbindung nicht durchseelt werden kann dadurch, daß man durch die Pforte des Todes das Entsprechende mitnimmt an religiöser Innigkeit, die aber spirituell ist, die nicht ein Wortreligiöses ist, dann kann nämlich der Erzengel nur wirken auf dasjenige, was pflanzenhaft im Kosmos ist und als das Pflanzenhafte in den Menschen hereingeschickt wird. Der Mensch wird dann durch sehr unterbewußte Kräfte, die mit seinem Pflanzentum, das heißt mit demjenigen, was ihn da hineinstellt in die Atmungsverhältnisse, die ja modifiziert werden durch die Sprachverhältnisse, durch all das also, was in der Sprache auf pflanzenhafte Weise in den menschlichen Organismus sich hineindrängt, durch das wird er, kann er nur von seinem Erzengel aus dirigiert werden. Es ist dann so, daß der Mensch mehr oder weniger, wenn er dann geboren ist, wenn er aufwächst als Kind, auf eine äußerliche Weise in die Sprache hineinwächst. Würde er die Beziehung, die innere, die seelische Beziehung zu seinem Erzengel haben finden können durch den Engel hindurch, dann würde das so geworden sein, daß er auch seelisch in das Sprachliche hineinwächst, daß er gewissermaßen den Genius der Sprache vernimmt, nicht bloß das, was das Außerliche, Mechanische der Sprache ist.

[ 17 ] Aber wir sehen ja heute, wie stark das der Fall ist, wie stark die Menschen heute in vieler Beziehung ein Abdruck des Mechanischen in ihrer Sprache sind, so daß sie eigentlich in ihrem ganzen Wesen nicht nur das Sprachliche wie einen Grundton tragen, sondern daß sie geradezu wie ein Abdruck des Sprachlichen sich ausnehmen; daß man genau sehen kann, wie der Gesichtsausdruck selber ein Ausdruck des Sprachlichen wird. Was uns als Volkstümer entgegentritt, die eigentümlichen volksmäßigen Physiognomien, wie sie uns heute entgegentreten, sie sind durchaus eben auf eine äußerliche Weise von seiten der Archangeloi an den Menschen herangekommen.

[ 18 ] Was äußerlich in der Menschheit sich abspielt, das kann, insoferne es in dem Geistigen des Menschen wirkt, eigentlich nur durch eine solche Betrachtung erklärbar werden, wie wir sie jetzt aus der anthroposophischen Geisteswissenschaft heraus anstellen, und alle heutige Anthropologie oder Ähnliches ist eigentlich bloß ein Spielen, möchte ich sagen, mit der Terminologie. Man hat eigentlich in vieler Beziehung in dem, was heute die Anthropologen oder ähnlicheLeute schreiben über die Konfiguration der Menschheit auf der Erde, über die Differenzierung der Menschheit, nirgends orientierende, leitende Gesichtspunkte, weil man das, was man als Begriffe auffaßt, nach äußerlichen Merkmalen gruppiert. Man kann ja das Ganze auch umgruppieren. Ein wirklicher Inhalt strömt doch erst in die Sache, wenn man sie geistig betrachtet. Dann darf man aber nicht zurückschrecken vor dem Aufsteigen zu der Betrachtung wirklicher konkreter Geistwesenheiten.

[ 19 ] Man sieht ja daraus auch, daß nur die geistige Vertiefung die Schäden der heutigen Zeit heilen kann. Diese Schäden der heutigen Zeit, insofern sie uns im öffentlichen Leben entgegentreten, gründen sich ja vielfach darauf, daß das Verhältnis des Menschen zu seinem Angelos und dadurch die Verbindung mit dem Erzengeltum ein loses geworden ist, und so, daß es nur von außen hereinwirken kann.

[ 20 ] Wenn der Mensch nun zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt die weitere Entwickelung durchmacht, die von der Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins aus dann wiederum hereinführt in das physische Erdenleben, so kommt er ja namentlich in den Bereich der Archai, der Urgründe. Diese Archai, diese Urgründe, sie haben es in der gegenwärtigen kosmischen Entwickelung damit zu tun, daß sie den Menschen gewissermaßen wiederum in die irdischen Grenzen seines Wesens zurückführen.

[ 21 ] Die Sache ist so: Wenn der Mensch durch die Pforte des Todes tritt, so lebt er so weiter, daß er zunächst die Folgen seines mineralischen Bewußtseins mit der moralischen Tingierung erlebt, dadurch sich gewissermaßen erweitert über die Welt. Dann zieht er sich von der Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins ab wiederum in sich zusammen. Zunächst wird er übergeführt in das Pflanzliche, das ihm eingegliedert wird. Und je mehr er sich dem irdischen Leben nähert, desto mehr zieht er sich gewissermaßen zusammen, so daß er als ein von seiner Haut umschlossenes Wesen wiederum geboren werden kann.

[ 22 ] Dieses, was da an dem Menschen zu geschehen hat, wenn er in den Bereich der Archai eintritt, das gliedert, verdichtet das Pflanzenhafte zum Tierischen. Der Mensch hat, indem er die Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins überschreitet, erst die Kräfte — natürlich nicht die Organe, sondern erst die Kräfte - in sich, die also sein Atmen, auch das differenzierte Atmen bedingen. Aber daß sich diese Kräfte dann zu den Organkräften konzentrieren, das geschieht erst nach der Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins, das geschieht erst in dem Bereich der Archai. Der Mensch wird sozusagen immer mehr und mehr Mensch. Aber es ist doch so, daß diese kosmische Wirkung, die da auf den Menschen ausgeübt wird im Sinne der Kräfte, die von den Archai ausgehen, den Menschen eigentlich so organisiert, daß die Organe nach der tierischen Bildung hinstreben. Wenn wir den Menschen in seiner Beziehung zum Kosmos auffassen, dann ist das so, daß der Mensch, indem er da herausstrebt von der Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins aus zu einem neuen Erdenleben, da ja geradeso unter kosmischen Gesetzen steht, wie er hier auf der Erde unter irdischen Gesetzen steht. Und wir können das Folgende sagen: Aus den unermeßlichen Weiten des Weltenalls heraus wird der Mensch bestimmt, indem er sich immer mehr und mehr zusammenzieht. Es ist gewissermaßen ein Ausdehnen des Menschen durch das mineralische Bewußtsein in die Weiten des Weltenalls hinaus bis zur Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins (siehe Zeichnung, Pfeile), in die unermeßlichen Weiten des Weltenalls hinaus. Wenn dann die Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins eintritt (blau), so gliedern sich dem Menschen die Kräfte ein, die dann in ihm als pflanzenähnliche Kräfte wirken. Von dieser Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins aus kehrt der Mensch wiederum zurück, um sich dann gewissermaßen für das irdische Leben zu begrenzen (Pfeile nach innen). Diese Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins ist überhaupt ein ungeheuer bedeutsamer Einschnitt in der Menschenentwickelung.

[ 23 ] Während der Mensch sich vom Tode aus hinauslebt in das Kosmische, wird er immer mehr und mehr mit der Welt eins. Er unterscheidet sich da wenig von der Welt. Ich möchte sagen, um das bildhaft auszudrücken — man kann natürlich von physischen Organen da draußen nicht sprechen, aber Sie werden mich verstehen, wenn ich in Bildern, die aus dem physischen Dasein hergenommen sind, dieses ausführe -: Er lernt gewissermaßen, wie das Auge mit dem Licht zusammenwächst, und er unterscheidet dann nicht mehr Licht und Auge, nicht mehr Ton und Ohr. Er wächst, indem er sich hinausdehnt in die Weite, mit dem Weltenall zusammen.

[ 24 ] Indem er dann passiert, was die Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins ist, wo er anfängt sich wiederum zusammenzuziehen, um wieder einmal ein begrenztes Wesen zu werden, da dämmert in ihm auf eine Art objektiver Vorstellung: Das ist jetzt nicht die Welt, sondern das ist der Mensch. Und immer stärker und stärker wird jetzt in dem Menschen ein Bewußtsein, das eigentlich am stärksten ist dann, wenn der Mensch wiederum ins irdische Leben zurücktritt. Aber wie hier auf der Erde der Inhalt unseres Bewußtseins die Mineralien, die Pflanzen, die Tiere, die Berge, die Flüsse, die Wolken, die Sterne, die Sonne, der Mond sind, so werden dann, bei diesem Rückgehen zur Erde, die Hauptvorstellungen die von dem Wesen des Menschen.

[ 25 ] Es ist wirklich so: Wenn wir auf der einen Seite die scheinbar recht komplizierte Welt nehmen, die da außerhalb unserer Haut liegt, mit allem, was darinnen ist, wenn wir die Welt nehmen mit ihrem Seelischen und Geistigen, sie ist gewiß sehr kompliziert, aber was innerhalb unserer Haut liegt, es ist ebenso kompliziert, es unterscheidet sich nur der Größe nach, aber auf die Größe kommt es nicht an. Unsere Welt ist dasjenige, was außerhalb unserer Haut liegt, wenn wir zwischen der Geburt und dem Tod leben; das, was innerhalb ist, schließen wir ja nur aus dem, was der Mensch während des Lebens eigentlich nicht in Wirklichkeit ist, aus dem Leichnam. Aber in der Zeit von der Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins bis zum nächsten Leben auf der Erde, da ist die Menschenwelt das Innere des Menschen nach Leib, Seele und Geist (siehe Zeichnung Seite 110, blau). Da ist gewissermaßen der Mensch die Welt. Wir verlieren nach und nach bis zur Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins an den Folgen des mineralischen Bewußtseins die Welt, indem wir uns allerdings in sie einleben, als ob sie unser Selbst, unser ganzes umfassendes Selbst wäre, so daß wir nicht mehr unterscheiden zwischen unserem Selbst und der Welt. Und indem wir wieder zurückkehren, wird unsere Welt der Mensch. Wir schauen nicht die Sterne, wir schauen die Gliederung der menschlichen Gliedmaßen, wir schauen nicht dasjenige, was sonst im Weltenall, sagen wir, zwischen Sternen und Erde enthalten ist, wir schauen das Innere der menschlichen Organisation, insofern es sich aus Geist und Seele herausgestaltet. Wir schauen den Menschen. Was wir da anschauen, das ist dasjenige, was uns hinführt zum erneuerten Erdendasein. Diesen sich gestaltenden Menschen schauen wir.

[ 26 ] Wir leben in der Zeit um die Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins herum in dem sich nach dem Pflanzlichen gestaltenden Menschen. Und wenn wir in die Region der Archai kommen, leben wir in dem, wie sich die Organe des Menschen im Sinne der tierischen Kräfte gestalten. Ich sagte: Geradeso wie wir zwischen der Geburt und dem Tode abhängig sind von dem, was von der Erde aus auf uns wirkt, so sind wir, indem wir da draußen im Weltenall sind — es ist jetzt nicht nur das Räumliche, aber man kann es ja natürlich nur räumlich darstellen -, abhängig von demjenigen, was außerirdisch ist. Und in dem Momente, wo wir durch die Archai durchgehen, können wir die Gesetze, die in uns wirken im Sinne des Weltenalls - so wie wir die Erdengesetze hier während unseres irdischen Gemeinschaftslebens durch die Gesetze der heutigen Physik prüfen —, wir können diese Gesetze ausdrücken, indem wir uns beziehen auf Widder, Stier, Zwillinge, Krebs, Löwe, Jungfrau, Waage und so weiter.

[ 27 ] Und indem wir die Stellungen desjenigen, was Sonne ist, auf diese Sterne beziehen, überhaupt auf den Fixsternhimmel beziehen, da haben wir in den Konstellationen der Sonne zu diesem Fixsternhimmel dasjenige, was an Gesetzen waltet im Bereiche des Willens der Archai. Der Wille, der da waltet, der durchsetzt diese Gesetze, das ist der Wille der Archai.

[ 28 ] Wenn wir aber da draußen Naturgesetze suchen würden in der Weise, die unseren Naturgesetzen so entsprechen, wie die Naturgesetze auf der Erde während unseres irdischen Daseins uns entsprechen, dann müßten wir auf diese Sternenkonstellationen sehen. Und wir sind ja lange Zeit in dem Bereich, wo wir also von den Sternenkonstellationen abhängig sind — aber nicht mehr, als wir hier auf der Erde abhängig sind von den Naturgesetzen, wo auch unser Wille dann wirkt, der etwas Höheres als die Naturgesetze ist. Wir dürfen auch da nicht vom Kosmos im Sinne einer mit mechanischer Notwendigkeit wirkenden kosmischen Gesetzmäßigkeit sprechen. Aber das, was wir in den Sternenkonstellationen finden, ist gewissermaßen der Ausdruck, das Bild für diese Gesetze, die da auf uns wirken. Und wie früher, wo wir allein im Bereich der Archangeloi waren, die Gesetze des Pflanzlichen auf uns gewirkt haben, so wirken jetzt die Gesetze des Tierähnlichen auf uns.

[ 29 ] Man kommt, wenn man diese Dinge wiederum durch Geisteswissenschaft findet, auf die ungeheuer bedeutsame Tatsache, daß die Alten, die aus gewissen traumhaften Schauungen des Weltenalls heraus auch Kenntnisse gehabt haben, die dann verlorengegangen sind, daß diese Alten wirklich, man möchte sagen, mit einer atavistischen Genialität diesen Bilderkreis, der ihnen den Fixsternhimmel repräsentierte, den Tierkreis nannten. Ich kann nicht anders als finden, daß uns neuere Geisteswissenschaft, die uns diese Dinge wieder zeigt, aus ganz anderen Untergründen heraus zum Verständnis dessen führt, was aus ahnungsvollem Erkennen einstmals durchschaut worden ist. Man wird, möchte ich sagen, ungeheuer ergriffen, wenn einem da von alten Zeiten her bewahrt ist die Lehre von dem Tierkreise und seiner Wirkung auf den Menschen, und wenn man dann, ganz abgesehen von dem, was da bewahrt ist, durch die Mittel der heutigen Geisteswissenschaft wiederum dazu kommt, Erkenntnisse mit den Konstellationen der Sonne zu den Tierkreisbildern, das heißt zum Fixsternhimmel, zu verbinden. Das ist es, was die neuere Geisteswissenschaft so eng zusammenschließt mit der Weisheit der Alten. Und zwischen uns, die wir suchen wollen die Geisteswissenschaft, und dieser Periode, wo die Weisheit der Alten waltete, haben wir etwas, was zwar notwendig war zur Erringung der menschlichen Freiheit, was aber doch im Grunde genommen darstellt ein Zeitalter der Finsternis.

[ 30 ] Wir kommen also in den Bereich der Archai und bekommen da eingegliedert, was unser tierisches Wesen ist. Was ist unser tierisches Wesen?

[ 31 ] Nun, unser tierisches Wesen ist das, was uns zunächst unsere Organe gibt, die ja bis auf die Zahl vielfach ähnlich sind mit den Organen der höheren Tiere. Aber ehe wir noch an die Geburt herankommen, werden wir aus dem bloßen, wenn ich mich jetzt so ausdrücken darf, Tierkreisbereich entlassen und rücken ein in den Bereich der Planeten, Saturn, Jupiter und so weiter. Indem wir in den Bereich der Planeten einrücken, indem wir also der Erde gewissermaßen näherkommen, näher dem Zeitpunkte, wo wir wiederum die menschliche Begrenzung annehmen, wird das, was in uns als das Tierische sich aus kosmischen Gesetzen heraus eingegliedert hat, wenn ich mich so ausdrücken darf, gerichtet. Ehe wir in das Planetensystem, also in die Kräfte des Planetensystems hereingetaucht sind, haben wir zum Beispiel nicht die Richtung mit dem Rückgrat von der Erde weg, mit dem Kopf nach oben gerichtet. Wir haben mehr das, was das Tier in bezug auf seine Richtkräfte beherrscht. Alles, was uns zum Beispiel die Hände als die Organe unseres Seelischen konstruiert, was sie nicht zum Greif-, nicht zum Gehorgan macht, was sie zu Organen macht, die aus den Impulsen des Seelischen heraus sich frei betätigen können, das verdanken wir dann diesem Einflusse des Planetarischen. Und alles das, was uns hilft als Menschen, bis in die niederste Stufe der tierischen Organisation ein Mensch zu sein, das verdanken wir dann der Konstellation des Mondes zu den übrigen Planeten.

[ 32 ] Wir werden also geradezu durch das Planetensystem vermenschlicht, indem wir zurückkehren. Ich sagte Ihnen: Der Mensch selber, der sich gestaltende Mensch ist die Welt, die in unserem Bewußtsein bei dieser Rückkehr von der Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins lebt. Wir sehen auch, wie zunächst vorhanden ist alles das, was zuletzt hinpulst nach den tierischen Kräften. Wir durchleben das so, daß wir es eigentlich durchleben wie eine Art von Untergang, wie eine Art von eisigem Vorgang. Aber das ganze wird, ich möchte sagen, gelockert, indem wir in den Planetenbereich treten, und das erst gestaltet die kosmische Welt, die wir so sehen als die Menschenwelt, zu der Welt, die der irdische Mensch darstellt, der sich dem Tierischen entreißt, der herauswächst aus dem Tierischen. Dies erfüllt uns nun. Dies wird der Inhalt unseres Bewußtseins. Wir tragen das, was der Kosmos uns gegeben hat, als ein System von Kräften in uns.

[ 33 ] So kommen wir geistig-seelisch aus den geistigen Welten herab. Wir haben durchlebt die Welten, in denen wir in unmittelbarer Berührung im Zusammenhang standen mit Angeloi, Archangeloi, Archai. Wir kommen so als Menschen herab. Aber allerdings, wenn wir in dem eben vorhin charakterisierten Sinne nicht intime Beziehungen zu unserem Engelwesen angeknüpft haben, dann haben wir Schwierigkeiten, wenn wir da in die Planetenregion eindringen, weil wir schon zu der Welt der Archai selbst keine göttlich-geistigen Beziehungen anknüpfen konnten. Äußerlich sind wir eingegliedert worden dem Volkstum. Die Archai haben dann wiederum die Notwendigkeit, gewissermaßen nur von außen in uns hereinzuwirken. Wir werden dadurch auf die Erde hingestellt, daß alle Kräfte von den Archai aus auf einen bestimmten Platz der Erde hintendieren. Der Erzengel oder die Erzengel schieben uns in ein Volkstum hinein. Unseren besonderen Platz innerhalb des Volkstums bestimmen dann die Archai. Wir wachsen unseelisch und ungeistig, auf eine äußerlich mechanische Weise hinein in diese Umgebung.

[ 34 ] Das ist ja ein Charakteristikon der heutigen Zeit, daß der Mensch nicht mehr etwa die innere Beziehung hat, die intime innere Beziehung hat, die er in älteren Zeiten zu seiner unmittelbaren Umgebung hatte, wo er auch seelisch hineinwuchs in diese unmittelbare Umgebung. In einer karikaturenhaften Weise ist dieses Hineinwachsen höchstens noch erhalten - nicht wahr, wie gesagt, karikaturhaft -, wenn heute, was aber auch schon aufhört, etwa die Kinder hineinwachsen in irgendein besonderes Schloß, nachdem sie zuvor zu ihren Ahnen hingetrieben worden sind. Da ist noch eine solche Beziehung, die in früheren Zeitläufen seelisch war. Heute wird der Mensch hineingedrängt in seine Umgebung, so daß er im Grunde genommen wenig innerliche Beziehung hat, daß er sich in einer ganz äußerlichen Weise an den Ort gestellt findet, an den ihn das Karma trägt, daß er überhaupt dieses ganze Hereingestelltsein in das physische Dasein als etwas Außerliches empfindet.

[ 35 ] Wenn des Menschen Wesen durch Erziehung und Leben so gestaltet wird, daß er durchseelt, durchgeistigt wird, daß er zu einer geistigen Weltauffassung kommt, dann wird er auch durch das Leben zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt das hindurchtragen, daß er das innige Verhältnis zu seinem Engel nicht löst, daß er in sein Volkstum durch den Erzengel seelenartig hineingetragen wird, daß er auch durch die Welt der Archai nicht bloß so äußerlich hineingestellt wird in das unmittelbare Dasein, sondern daß er wiederum schon in seine tierische Organisation etwas aufnehmen kann, was er dann so empfindet, daß er sich sagt: Es hat eine tiefe Bedeutung, daß ich gerade von diesem Orte, wo zunächst mein Bewußtsein allmählich erwacht, wo meine Erziehung geleitet wird, daß ich von diesem Orte in die Welt hinaus meine Wirksamkeit entfalte. Das ist allerdings etwas, was wir dadurch herbeiführen müssen, daß wir die Erziehung in dem Sinne reformieren, daß der Mensch wiederum empfindet: Von dem Orte seiner Erziehung nimmt er etwas mit, was ihm dann seine Mission in der Welt gibt. Dann, wenn das so ist, wird der Mensch aber auch gewissermaßen herauswachsen aus dem bloß äußerlichen Bereiche der Archai. Er wird die menschlichen Richtkräfte in durchseelter und durchgeistigter Weise erleben, und er wird in anderer Weise in das neue Leben hereinwachsen, als das heute vielfach der Fall ist.

[ 36 ] Also, wie ist es denn eigentlich, wenn der Mensch da ankommt bei einem neuen Erdenleben? Sein Bewußtsein ist erfüllt von dem, wie er von innen heraus seinen Menschen konfiguriert. Er ist erfüllt von einer Welt, die er schaut, die eine Wirkenswelt ist, nicht etwa eine bloße Gedankenwelt. Diese Welt hat allmählich seit der Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins, wie ich ausgeführt habe, die Tendenz des Willens zum Menschentum hin angenommen, und der Mensch taucht unter in das, was ihm entgegengebracht wird durch die Vererbung der Generationen, durch die Substanz, die er von seinen Ahnen erhält. Er taucht darinnen unter. Er umhüllt sich mit der physischen Hülle. Er tritt in die physische Welt herein. Wir können in der Tat, wenn wir den Menschen geistig betrachten, finden, wie der Inhalt des Seelischen ist, wenn er untertaucht in das physische Dasein zu einem neuen Leben.

[ 37 ] Natürlich ist es in dem ganzen Gebiete, das der Mensch durchlebt zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt, so, daß der Mensch da in die nächsten Beziehungen kommt zu Angeloi, Archangeloi, Archai; diese aber wieder stehen weiter hinauf mit den höheren Hierarchien in Beziehung. Und so durchläuft, durchwandert der Mensch zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt ein Gebiet, in dem aber für seine Beziehungen zu diesem Gebiete durchaus maßgebend ist dasjenige, was er durch die Todespforte trägt. Denn so, wie es ihm gelungen ist, das, was aus den Tiefen seines Wesens als Geistiges herauf will, mit dem mineralischen Bewußtsein zu durchdringen, so intim kann er werden mit seinem Engelwesen. Dadurch aber, daß er so intim mit seinem Engelwesen werden kann, wächst er in die Welt der Archangeloi hinein, so daß er gewissermaßen ihre Kraft von sich aus erkennend, empfindend, bewußt erwidern kann, so daß er dann weitergehen kann und das individualisierte Wesen wird, das er allmählich werden muß, wenn die Welt einem Aufgange, nicht einem Niedergange entgegengehen soll.

[ 38 ] Es ist durchaus möglich, von den verschiedensten Gesichtspunkten aus dieses Leben zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt ganz prägnant zu beschreiben. Einen Gesichtspunkt finden Sie ja in meinem Vortragszyklus, den ich im Jahre 1914 in Wien gehalten habe; einen anderen Gesichtspunkt habe ich Ihnen heute entwickelt. Alle diese Gesichtspunkte sind geeignet, immer mehr und mehr den Menschen auch nach der geistigen Seite hin kennenzulernen. Wer aber nicht in dieser Weise zu einer ganzen geistigen Welt herausgehen will, der wird niemals das Geistige im Menschen selber begreifen können. Wie wir in die Zwischenräume zwischen physischem Leib, Ätherleib, astralischem Leib und Ich gehen müssen, um das Seelische in seiner Objektivität zu durchschauen, so müssen wir aus dem Menschen heraus in die geistige Welt gehen, um seine Beziehungen zu dieser geistigen Welt zu studieren. Dann finden wir das, was im Menschen eigentlich als Geistiges webt und lebt. Es ist nur die Bequemlichkeit unserer Zeit, daß man vom Geist nur im Allgemeinen spricht. Wir müssen in die Möglichkeit kommen, von dem Geiste zu sprechen in allen Einzelheiten, wie wir von der Natur sprechen in allen Einzelheiten. Dann wird wirkliche Menschenerkenntnis erstehen, dann wird in dem Sinne, wie es der Mensch braucht, das uralte Wahrwort erfüllt, das schon von Griechenland heraufleuchtet, dessen Erfüllung aber noch immer angestrebt werden muß für den Menschen, das Wahrwort: «Erkenne dich selbst!»

[ 39 ] Selbsterkenntnis ist Weltenerkenntnis und Weltenerkenntnis ist Selbsterkenntnis. Denn leben wir zwischen der Geburt und dem Tode, dann sind die Sterne und die Sonne und der Mond und die Berge und die Täler und die Flüsse und die Pflanzen und die Tiere und die Mineralien unsere Welt, und dasjenige, was innerhalb unserer Menschengrenze lebt, das sind wir. Leben wir zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt, dann ist das, was sich als Geistiges verbirgt hinter Sonne, Mond, hinter den Sternen, hinter Bergen und Flüssen — das sind wir, und unsere Welt ist dann des Menschen Inneres. Welt und Mensch wechseln rhythmisch, indem der Mensch physisch und geistig lebt. Für den Menschen hier auf Erden ist die Welt die da draußen. Für den Menschen zwischen Tod und neuer Geburt ist die Welt das da drinnen. Daher handelt es sich nur um das Abwechseln der Zeiten, daß der Mensch sagen kann: Menschenerkenntnis ist Welterkenntnis und Welterkenntnis ist Menschenerkenntnis im wirklichsten Sinne.

Sixth Lecture

[ 1 ] We have seen how our consideration of the soul conditions of human beings leads us, as it were, into the spaces between the physical body, the etheric body, the astral body, and the I; but we have also seen how our consideration of the spiritual conditions in human beings leads us, as it were, out of the appearance of human beings here, as they have it in their lives between birth and death, into the wide spiritual universe. Insofar as the human being is spirit, one might say, he stands in a relationship to the entire spiritual universe. And therefore, what takes place in the human being as spiritual events can only be properly understood in this connection with the entire universe. The soul is, so to speak, the intimate inner life of the human being. It takes place in a threefold form, in such a way that the thinking is located between the physical body and the etheric body, the feeling between the etheric body and the astral body, and the will between the astral body and the I. Thus, in our consideration of the soul, we remain entirely within the human being. But as soon as we approach real spiritual events, we must step out of the human being as he initially appears to us as a closed being in the world between birth and death.

[ 2 ] Now we know – and we discussed this again eight days ago from a certain point of view – that when we ascend into the spiritual realm, we encounter beings that are arranged above human beings in a similar way to how the animal, plant, and mineral kingdoms are arranged below human beings. As we ascend, we encounter beings called Angeloi, angelic beings; Archangeloi, archangelic beings; and Archai, primordial beings, spirits of the times. We have already characterized these beings, which in a sense constitute the realms we encounter when we look at the position of the human being in relation to the spiritual world, from various points of view. Those beings that are called angeloi or angels are those that have the strongest relationship to the individual, to the single human being. The individual human being does indeed have such a relationship to the first hierarchy above him that he develops, in a sense — it is not expressed quite accurately, but one can say it as it is often expressed in popular parlance — a certain relationship to such an angelic being.

[ 3] Those who then make up the second hierarchy above him are the archangels. We can speak of them in such a way that we first assign to them in their functions what acts as folk spirits, that is, what encompasses groups of people who belong together as a people, although there are all kinds of gradations.

[ 4 ] When we finally ascend to the higher Archai, we have, in a sense, the leading beings throughout certain epochs, beyond the differentiations of the folk element. This is certainly not the only function of these beings, but we get certain ideas when we stick to the function we find in them.

Archai, primordial beings, spirits of the times
Archangeloi, archangelic beings
Angeloi, angelic beings.

[ 5 ] Just as we can understand the physical life of human beings on earth by asking ourselves: What relationship do they have to the animal organization, to the plant organization, to the mineral organization? — we must ask ourselves: What relationship does he have to these stages of being that extend into the spiritual realm? — in order to recognize him as a spiritual being.

[ 6 ] To do this, we must proceed in the following manner. Let us imagine, from certain points of view, how human beings pass through the gate of death. We know that, as we now live as human beings in this period of Earth's development, which spans many years, the laws underlying the mineral kingdom become present to our ordinary consciousness. From birth to death, human beings fill themselves, so to speak, with everything that makes the mineral kingdom comprehensible to them in a certain sense, and they have a feeling that they can understand the mineral kingdom with the concepts and ideas available to them.

[ 7 ] This is not the case with the plant kingdom. You know that science stops short of the plant kingdom, at most positing the ideal that the complicated composition of plant cells, of living cells in general, will one day be explainable in terms of their structure, which, as I have explained to you, is a completely wrong approach, because the structure of plants or living cells in general is not characterized by a particularly complicated structure, but by the chemical structure entering into chaos. However, humans cannot go beyond these concepts of the mineral realm. He is even less able to enter into the animal realm, or even to self-knowledge, with his, if I may say so, mineral concepts. All this must be provided by spiritual scientific research. Man therefore acquires a consciousness that is, let us call it, mineral, that is, suitable for the mineral realm.

[ 8 ] This consciousness, which is woven between birth and death, carries its consequences through death. With what can become of this consciousness when he passes through the gate of death and lives in the spiritual realm itself, he must then journey through his further existence.

[ 9 ] But something else strikes this consciousness in a very significant way. What extends into this mineral consciousness, even though it does not belong to it at all, what tinges it, is moral consciousness; it is that which comes from all the processes of consciousness that follow our impulses of will, our actions. What we feel as our satisfaction with this or that, what we feel as our pangs of conscience, as our reproaches and the like, all this colors our mineral consciousness, so to speak, and this is something that man also takes with him through the gate of death. So we can say that with a mineral consciousness tinged by moral experience, human beings pass through the gate of death; and with what may result from this, they then live on in the spiritual realm.

[ 10 ] Now it is the case that through this mineral consciousness, human beings not only understand the mineral world here, but that through this mineral consciousness they develop their relationship to the being from the hierarchy of the Angeloi, that is, to the being to whom he wants to turn as the one closest to his individual development. And when man has now passed through the gate of death, the question is to what extent he can, through the consequences of his mineral consciousness, maintain a relationship with this angelic being. He can only do so in accordance with what has colored this mineral consciousness from the moral side. For this mineral consciousness strives, after death, to spread out into the world, so to speak. It strives to become cosmic, to adapt itself to the universe; it strives beyond the individual.

[ 11 ] We can also say that in the life between birth and death, human beings are closest to angelic beings when they live in the state from which dreams arise, which certainly have something to do with their individual nature and which, on the one hand, deny and, on the other hand, hold fast to the mineral-mental nature. Human beings would not be able to find this subconscious relationship to the hierarchy of the Angeloi if their mineral consciousness were not tinged by the states that they sleep through in a certain sense, but which are nevertheless those that protrude from the state of sleep and then live out in the dream worlds. The dream itself, with the exception that its contours do not adhere to external sensory reality and that it often denies contact with external sensory reality, is nevertheless woven from the same substance as the world of thoughts between birth and death.

Thus, when a person passes through the gate of death, they take with them what they have developed within their mineral consciousness in order to maintain their relationship with their angelic being.

[ 12 ] Now, as we live today in our present epoch of humanity, human beings—especially those who consider themselves fully enlightened—have little connection between what they have as mineral consciousness and their moral experience. On the contrary, they strive as much as possible to keep this mineral consciousness away from the moral. They want to establish at least these two worlds within themselves: on the one hand, they want to consider everything that can ultimately be understood in the realm of mineral nature, and insofar as mineral nature extends into the plant, animal, and human realms; and then, as something that springs forth from within themselves, they want to consider the moral realm. It is contrary to the spirit of our time to think of what lives in nature as being imbued with moral impulses at the same time. There is a gulf between the moral and the mineral. It is not easy for human beings to find a bridge to integrate the moral into the mineral. I have often pointed out how human beings imagine the development of the earth to be purely mineral, from the contents of Kant and Laplace's theory to what is thought of as mineral in modern times, and how human beings exclude everything that is moral feeling. This is why humans are able to develop an extremely limited relationship with the nature of the angeloi, why in our present age they are, so to speak, unable to form a close bond with their angelic nature.

[ 13 ] If the mineral consciousness were completely separated from moral tinges, then human beings would even be in danger of completely losing the necessary connection with the angelic being before what I call the midnight hour of existence. I say: run the risk. Very few people today run this risk; but unless there is a spiritual deepening of the entire human development on earth, of human thinking, feeling, and willing throughout the earth, then what exists as a danger will become a reality, and there would be numerous people who, between death and a new birth, would sever their connection with their angelic beings as soon as they approached the midnight hour of existence. and there would be numerous people who, between death and a new birth, would have to sever their ties with their angelic beings as soon as they approached the midnight hour of existence. The angelic beings would still maintain ties, but these would remain one-sided, from them to the human being. The human being would not be able to respond to them in a sufficient manner between death and a new birth. We must be quite clear that the newer culture, which is rushing toward materialism, has the effect on the spiritual life of human beings that it impairs their relationship with their angelic beings, that this relationship becomes looser and looser. But it is precisely when human beings approach the midnight hour of existence that they must establish a relationship with their archangel through their angelic being. If this relationship, as it can certainly be when human beings live in the spiritual world, is to be such that it does not only go one-sidedly from the angelic being to humanity, but can also be reciprocated by human beings, then human beings must take in spiritual content, that is, they must give their moral impulses a religious tinge.

[ 14 ] The human being of today is therefore in danger that, if the same development continues, he will have a loose relationship with his angelic being and thus be unable to establish an inner relationship with the archangelic being. But the archangelic being is already involved in bringing him back to physical life. The archangelic being is specifically involved in developing the forces that bring them back into a certain community.

[ 15 ] If people live spiritually empty lives, as has been the case for centuries, then the relationship between archangels and humans develops in a one-sided way, and then human beings do not grow into the folk community with their inner soul nature, but are, so to speak, placed into the folk community from outside, let us say through the world order, which is assigned to the archangel to guide. We cannot come to an understanding of our present age, which is characterized precisely by the one-sided cultivation of ethnic groups, until we know that this stems from the fact that the souls who have recently descended into earthly existence have only a loose connection to their angelic beings and therefore no inner connection to the archangelic beings, so that they grow into their folk culture only from the outside, as it were; that folk culture is then entirely a soulless impulse within them, and people are only part of the folk culture through external impulses, through a sense of belonging through language, through all kinds of impulses tending toward chauvinism. Those who are spiritually rooted in their ethnic heritage — and this is the case with very few people today — will not develop into chauvinism or one-sided nationalism, but will instead develop the fruitful forces within their ethnic heritage and make them their own. But they will not insist on their ethnicity in a certain one-sided way. They will, as it were, allow it to flow into their human expressions everywhere as the color of their being, but they will not bring it out in an external way, especially not in an external way that is hostile to others.

[ 16 ] The fact that this is the case today, that it actually sets the tone for world politics, that all relationships based on ethnicity pose such difficulties for human development today, is entirely due to what I have just indicated. For if the connection that is made at the midnight hour of existence — before and after, throughout long periods of time — cannot be imbued with the corresponding religious intimacy, which is spiritual and not verbal, then the archangel can only work on that which is plant-like in the cosmos and is sent into human beings as the plant-like element. The human being is then directed by very subconscious forces that are connected with his plant nature, that is, with that which places him in the breathing conditions, which are modified by the language conditions, by everything that penetrates the human organism in a plant-like manner through language. Through this, he can only be directed by his archangel. It is then the case that, when they are born and grow up as children, human beings more or less grow into language in an external way. If he had been able to find the relationship, the inner, spiritual relationship to his archangel through the angel, then he would have grown spiritually into language, so that he would have perceived, as it were, the genius of language, not just the external, mechanical aspects of language.

[ 17 ] But we see today how strongly this is the case, how strongly people today are in many respects an imprint of the mechanical in their language, so that they actually carry not only the linguistic as a basic tone in their whole being, but that they appear as an imprint of the linguistic; that one can see exactly how the facial expression itself becomes an expression of the linguistic. What we encounter as folk characteristics, the peculiar folk physiognomies that we encounter today, have come to humanity in an external way from the Archangels.

[ 18 ] What takes place externally in humanity can, insofar as it works in the human spirit, only be explained by such a consideration as we now make from anthroposophical spiritual science, and all present-day anthropology or the like is really just playing, I would say, with terminology. In many respects, what anthropologists and similar people write today about the configuration of humanity on Earth, about the differentiation of humanity, lacks any orienting, guiding points of view, because what they take as concepts is grouped according to external characteristics. The whole thing could just as well be regrouped. Real content only flows into things when you look at them spiritually. But then you must not shy away from rising to the contemplation of real, concrete spiritual beings.

[ 19 ] This also shows that only spiritual deepening can heal the damage of the present age. These damages of the present age, insofar as they confront us in public life, are based in many cases on the fact that the relationship of human beings to their angelos, and thus their connection with the archangelic, has become loose, so that it can only work from outside.

[ 20 ] When human beings undergo further development between death and a new birth, which then leads them back into physical life on earth from the midnight hour of existence, they enter the realm of the archai, the primordial forces. These archetypes, these primordial principles, have to do with the present cosmic development in that they lead human beings back, as it were, into the earthly limits of their being.

[ 21 ] The thing is this: when a human being passes through the gate of death, he continues to live in such a way that he first experiences the consequences of his mineral consciousness with a moral tinge, thereby expanding, as it were, over the world. Then, from the midnight hour of existence, he withdraws again into himself. First, they are transferred to the plant world, into which they are integrated. And the closer they come to earthly life, the more they contract, so to speak, so that they can be reborn as beings enclosed by their skin.

[ 22 ] This, which must happen to the human being when he enters the realm of the archai, structures and condenses the plant realm into the animal realm. When humans pass the midnight hour of existence, they first have within themselves the forces—not the organs, of course, but only the forces—that determine their breathing, including differentiated breathing. But these forces do not concentrate into organ forces until after the midnight hour of existence; this happens only in the realm of the archai. Human beings become, so to speak, more and more human. But it is nevertheless the case that this cosmic influence exerted on human beings in the sense of forces emanating from the archai actually organizes human beings in such a way that the organs strive toward animal formation. When we understand human beings in their relationship to the cosmos, we see that, as they strive out of the midnight hour of existence toward a new life on earth, they are subject to cosmic laws just as they are subject to earthly laws here on earth. And we can say the following: Human beings are determined from the immeasurable vastness of the universe by contracting themselves more and more. It is, in a sense, an expansion of human beings through mineral consciousness into the vastness of the universe until the midnight hour of existence (see drawing, arrows), into the immeasurable vastness of the universe. When the midnight hour of existence arrives (blue), the forces that then work in humans as plant-like forces become integrated into them. From this midnight hour of existence, the human being returns again, in order to then limit himself, so to speak, to earthly life (arrows pointing inward). This midnight hour of existence is an enormously significant turning point in human development.

[ 23 ] As human beings live out their lives from death into the cosmic realm, they become more and more one with the world. They differ little from the world. To express this figuratively, I would say—of course one cannot speak of physical organs out there, but you will understand me if I explain this using images taken from physical existence—that he learns, in a sense, how the eye grows together with light, and then he no longer distinguishes between light and eye, between sound and ear. He grows by expanding into the vastness, together with the universe.

[ 24 ] When he then passes through what is the midnight hour of existence, when he begins to contract again in order to become a limited being once more, a kind of objective idea dawns within him: This is not the world, but this is the human being. And now, a consciousness grows stronger and stronger in the human being, which is actually strongest when the human being returns to earthly life. But just as here on earth the content of our consciousness is minerals, plants, animals, mountains, rivers, clouds, stars, the sun, and the moon, so then, in this return to earth, the main ideas become those of the essence of man.

[ 2 ] It is really so: if we take, on the one hand, the seemingly quite complicated world that lies outside our skin, with everything that is in it, if we take the world with its soul and spirit, it is certainly very complicated, but what lies within our skin is just as complicated; it differs only in size, but size does not matter. Our world is that which lies outside our skin when we live between birth and death; that which lies within, we exclude only from what man is not in reality during life, from the corpse. But in the time from midnight of existence to the next life on earth, the human world is the inner being of the human being, consisting of body, soul, and spirit (see drawing on page 110, blue). In a sense, the human being is the world. Until midnight of our existence, we gradually lose the world as a result of mineral consciousness, although we live in it as if it were our self, our entire comprehensive self, so that we no longer distinguish between our self and the world. And when we return, our world becomes the human being. We do not look at the stars, we look at the structure of the human limbs, we do not look at what else is contained in the universe, say, between the stars and the earth, we look at the inner workings of the human organization, insofar as it is formed out of spirit and soul. We look at the human being. What we see there is what leads us to a renewed earthly existence. We look at this human being who is forming himself.

[ 26 ] We live in the time around the midnight hour of existence, in which the human being is forming himself out of the plant realm. And when we come to the region of the archai, we live in the way in which the organs of the human being are forming themselves in the sense of animal forces. I said: Just as we are dependent between birth and death on what acts upon us from the earth, so, in being out there in the universe—it is not only spatial, but of course one can only represent it spatially—we are dependent on what is extraterrestrial. And at the moment when we pass through the archai, we can express the laws that work within us in terms of the universe — just as we test the laws of the earth here during our earthly community life through the laws of modern physics — we can express these laws by referring to Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, and so on.

[ 27 ] And by relating the positions of what is the sun to these stars, to the fixed starry sky in general, we have in the constellations of the sun in relation to this fixed starry sky that which reigns as laws in the realm of the will of the Archai. The will that reigns there, that enforces these laws, is the will of the Archai.

[ 28 ] But if we were to seek natural laws out there in the same way that our natural laws correspond to us during our earthly existence, then we would have to look at these constellations. And we have long been in the realm where we are dependent on the constellations of the stars — but no more than we are dependent here on Earth on the laws of nature, where our will also works, which is something higher than the laws of nature. We must not speak of the cosmos in the sense of a cosmic law acting with mechanical necessity. But what we find in the constellations of the stars is, in a sense, the expression, the image of these laws that are working on us. And just as in the past, when we were alone in the realm of the archangels, the laws of the plant world worked on us, so now the laws of the animal world are working on us.

[ 29 ] When one discovers these things through spiritual science, one comes to the enormously significant fact that the ancients, who also had knowledge gained from certain dreamlike visions of the universe, which was then lost, that these ancients really, one might say, with an atavistic genius, called this circle of images, which represented the fixed starry sky to them, the zodiac. I cannot help but find that the newer spiritual science, which shows us these things again, leads us from completely different foundations to an understanding of what was once seen through intuitive knowledge. One is, I would say, deeply moved when the teaching of the zodiac and its effect on human beings has been preserved from ancient times, and when, quite apart from what has been preserved, one then comes again, through the means of modern spiritual science, to connect insights with the constellations of the sun and the zodiac images, that is, with the fixed starry sky. This is what connects modern spiritual science so closely with the wisdom of the ancients. And between us, who want to seek spiritual science, and this period when the wisdom of the ancients prevailed, we have something that was necessary for the attainment of human freedom, but which nevertheless represents an age of darkness.

[ 30 ] We thus enter the realm of the archai and are integrated into what is our animal nature. What is our animal nature?

[ 31 ] Well, our animal nature is what initially gives us our organs, which are, except for their number, very similar to the organs of higher animals. But before we even reach birth, we are released from the mere, if I may express it thus, zodiacal realm and enter the realm of the planets, Saturn, Jupiter, and so on. By entering the realm of the planets, by coming closer to the Earth, so to speak, closer to the point in time when we once again take on human limitations, that which has become integrated into us as the animal nature through cosmic laws, if I may express it that way, is directed. Before we entered the planetary system, that is, before we were immersed in the forces of the planetary system, we did not, for example, have our spine pointing away from the Earth with our head pointing upwards. We had more of what the animal has in terms of its directional forces. Everything that makes our hands, for example, the organs of our soul, everything that does not make them organs of touch or obedience, everything that makes them organs that can act freely out of the impulses of the soul, we owe to this planetary influence. And everything that helps us as human beings to be human beings down to the lowest level of animal organization, we owe to the constellation of the moon in relation to the other planets.

[ 32 ] We are therefore humanized by the planetary system itself through our return. I told you: the human being himself, the human being who shapes himself, is the world that lives in our consciousness during this return from the midnight hour of existence. We also see how everything that ultimately strives toward animal forces is initially present. We experience this in such a way that we actually experience it as a kind of decline, as a kind of icy process. But the whole thing is, I would say, loosened up when we enter the planetary realm, and this is what shapes the cosmic world that we see as the human world, the world represented by earthly human beings who tear themselves away from the animal realm and grow out of it. This now fills us. This becomes the content of our consciousness. We carry within us what the cosmos has given us as a system of forces.

[ 33 ] Thus we descend spiritually and soulfully from the spiritual worlds. We have lived through the worlds in which we were in direct contact with angeloi, archangeloi, and archai. We thus descend as human beings. But if we have not established intimate relationships with our angelic beings in the sense just described, we will encounter difficulties when we enter the planetary region, because we have not been able to establish divine-spiritual relationships with the world of the Archai themselves. Outwardly, we have been integrated into the folk culture. The Archai then have the necessity, so to speak, to work on us only from outside. We are placed on the earth in such a way that all forces from the Archai tend toward a certain place on the earth. The archangel or archangels push us into a folk culture. The Archai then determine our particular place within the ethnic group. We grow soullessly and spiritually dead, in an outwardly mechanical way, into this environment.

[ 34 ] This is a characteristic feature of the present age, that human beings no longer have the inner relationship, the intimate inner relationship that they had in earlier times with their immediate surroundings, where they also grew spiritually into these immediate surroundings. In a caricatured way, this growing into something is preserved at most — not really, as I said, caricatured — when today, but even that is already coming to an end, children grow into some special castle after having been driven there by their ancestors. There is still a relationship that was spiritual in earlier times. Today, people are pushed into their environment in such a way that they have little inner relationship to it, that they find themselves placed in a completely external way in the place where karma carries them, that they experience this whole being placed in physical existence as something external.

[ 35 ] If a person's being is shaped by education and life in such a way that they become soul-filled, spirit-filled, that they come to a spiritual view of the world, then they will also carry this through the life between death and a new birth, he will not sever his intimate relationship with his angel, he will be carried soulfully into his nationality through the archangel, and he will not merely be placed externally into immediate existence through the world of the archai, but will again be able to take something into his animal organization which he then feels in such a way that he says to himself: It has a profound meaning that I am developing my effectiveness in the world from this very place, where my consciousness gradually awakens and where my education is guided. This is, of course, something we must bring about by reforming education in such a way that human beings once again feel: From the place of his education, he takes with him something that then gives him his mission in the world. Then, when this is the case, human beings will also, in a sense, outgrow the merely external realm of the archai. They will experience the human guiding forces in a soulful and spiritual way, and they will grow into the new life in a different way than is often the case today.

[ 36 ] So what actually happens when a human being arrives at a new life on earth? His consciousness is filled with how he configures his human being from within. He is filled with a world that he sees, which is a world of activity, not merely a world of thoughts. Since the midnight hour of existence, as I have explained, this world has gradually taken on the tendency of the will toward humanity, and the human being plunges into what is presented to him through the inheritance of generations, through the substance he receives from his ancestors. He plunges into it. He envelops himself in the physical shell. He enters the physical world. Indeed, when we consider man spiritually, we can see what the content of the soul is when it submerges into physical existence for a new life.

[ 37 ] Of course, in the entire realm that human beings pass through between death and a new birth, human beings come into close contact with angeloi, archangeloi, and archai; but these in turn are connected with the higher hierarchies. And so, between death and a new birth, the human being passes through a realm in which, however, what he carries through the gate of death is entirely decisive for his relationships in this realm. For just as he has succeeded in permeating with his mineral consciousness that which wants to rise up from the depths of his being as spirit, so intimately can he become acquainted with his angelic being. But because they can become so intimate with their angelic being, they grow into the world of the archangels, so that they can, as it were, recognize, feel, and consciously respond to their power, so that they can then go on and become the individualized beings that they must gradually become if the world is to move toward an ascent and not a descent.

[ 38 ] It is entirely possible to describe this life between death and a new birth very concisely from a variety of perspectives. You will find one perspective in the series of lectures I gave in Vienna in 1914; I have developed another perspective for you today. All these points of view are suitable for getting to know human beings more and more from the spiritual side. But those who do not want to go out in this way into a whole spiritual world will never be able to understand the spiritual in human beings themselves. Just as we must go into the spaces between the physical body, the etheric body, the astral body, and the I in order to see through the soul in its objectivity, so we must go out of human beings into the spiritual world in order to study their relationships to this spiritual world. Then we will find what actually weaves and lives in human beings as the spiritual. It is only the convenience of our time that we speak of the spirit only in general terms. We must come to be able to speak of the spirit in all its details, just as we speak of nature in all its details. Then true knowledge of human beings will arise, and then, in the sense that human beings need it, the ancient truth that has shone down from Greece will be fulfilled, but whose fulfillment must still be strived for by human beings: “Know thyself!”

[ 39 ] Self-knowledge is knowledge of the world, and knowledge of the world is self-knowledge. For when we live between birth and death, the stars and the sun and the moon and the mountains and the valleys and the rivers and the plants and the animals and the minerals are our world, and that which lives within our human limits is what we are. If we live between death and a new birth, then what is hidden as spirit behind the sun, moon, stars, mountains, and rivers is us, and our world is then the inner world of human beings. The world and human beings change rhythmically as human beings live physically and spiritually. For human beings here on earth, the world is out there. For humans between death and rebirth, the world is that which is within. Therefore, it is only a matter of the alternation of times that humans can say: knowledge of humans is knowledge of the world, and knowledge of the world is knowledge of humans in the truest sense.

OSZAR »